Skip to main content

Follow Us

Social networking will appear here

Support Us

Join  |   Donate  |   Volunteer  |   Newsletter
LWV of Seattle King County is a
501 (c)(3) Charitable Organization.
Tax ID: 91-1224769

Contact Us

Email: info@lwvskc.org
Phone: (206) 329-4848
LWV of Seattle King County
1511 3rd Avenue, Suite 801
Seattle, WA 98101
    Copyright - 2020 - All Rights Reserved - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy  - Powered by ClubExpress
HomeThe Voter Newsletter

Our Newsletter

The Voter features information on our forums and other public events; our neighborhood discussion groups; volunteer opportunities; our voter registration and education efforts; and our work on issues like accountability for local government, climate change, education, health care, and police reform.


Do you have an idea? Send us your news! Contact the Voter Editor at votereditor@lwvskc.org. Submissions are due by the 15th of the month for the next edition.

View a PDF of the current issue of The Voter.

Our Mission

The League of Women Voters of Seattle-King County, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Want to work with us? Become a member!
Want to reach us? We’re at
info@lwvskc.org!
Want to support us? Donate today!

Past Issues

View past issues of The Voter.

What Is the "One Big Beautiful Bill" - and What Is Its Impact?

LWVUS


On July 4, the President signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), a nearly 1,000-page bill that changes federal spending levels by stripping tens of millions of our most vulnerable neighbors of their health care and nutrition.

The OBBB slashes vital programs like Medicaid, Medicare, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps) to pay for tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthiest Americans. This article looks at just some of the new laws provisions, many of which will go into effect over the coming years, causing confusion about when and why people are losing their benefits.

 

How the OBBB Impacts Health Coverage: Medicaid and Medicare

Medicaid Cuts

Medicaid is the country's single largest source of health coverage, insuring nearly 72 millionor 1 in 5. This includes children, pregnant people, parents, older adults with limited incomes, and people with disabilities. Medicaid covers essential care like doctors' visits, hospitalizations, long-term care, maternity care, mental health treatment, and rural clinic services.

The OBBB makes the largest cuts to Medicaid in the programs history. According to the latest estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law will cause 10 million more people to become uninsured by 2034.

Making it Harder to Enroll and Stay Enrolled in Medicaid

The new law will drop eligible people from Medicaid due to increased administrative burden. This is because the bill requires a significant amount of new paperwork that will likely result in eligible people being dropped due to missing mail, late submissions, states being overburdened, and more.

 

For the next decade, the OBBB blocks the implementation of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligibility and Enrollment final rule, which was designed to streamline the process for people to enroll and stay enrolled in Medicaid and apply for the Medicare Savings Program. The Medicare Savings Program helps people with low incomes afford Medicare premiums and cost-sharing.

The OBBB also requires states to check the eligibility of Medicaid expansion enrollees (adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level) every six months instead of every 12 months.

Medicaid Job Loss Penalty

The new law requires Medicaid recipients who are able-bodied and 19-64 years of age to work, do community service, or participate in work training for at least 80 hours per month, or go to school part time. This includes people with children over 13 years of age.

 

Most Medicaid enrollees already work, and most who do not will be exempt from this new requirement. Thus, the OBBB will not increase the number of people who are employed but will drop more eligible people from Medicaid due to administrative errors and unexpected job loss.

Medicaid Cost Sharing Requirement

The new law requires states to impose cost-sharing of up to $35 per health care service for Medicaid expansion recipients. This means that for every medical service they seek, Medicaid expansion recipients who are in the program due to their low-income status and are often chronically ill or disabled will need to pay up to $35. Over time, these payments can add up to unmanageable costs.

Limiting Medicaid Funding

The OBBB will make it harder for states to raise Medicaid funds, which will decrease how much the federal government contributes to the program.

Medicaid is jointly funded by the federal and state governments, and the federal government matches" state funding at a rate of 50-77% per Medicaid enrollee and 90% per Medicaid expansion enrollee. All but one US state raises some of its Medicaid funding through taxes on health care providers like hospitals, known as provider taxes. The new law prohibits states from imposing new or higher provider taxes and requires states with Medicaid expansion to reduce their provider taxes by 0.5% each year until they reach 3.5%.

 

A Medicaid Error Rate Penalty

The law also reduces federal funding for states with a more than 3% error rate for overpayment to eligible individuals and payments to ineligible individuals, including where there isnt enough information to confirm someones Medicaid eligibility. Fear of losing federal funding due to payment errors could result in states denying eligible people coverage.

Medicare Cuts

Medicare is a public health insurance program for people 65 years of age or older and people with specific disabilities, insuring more than 66 million people. A CBO analysis estimates that the OBBB will cause a $45 billion cut to Medicare in 2026, growing to a $75 billion cut in 2034. These massive Medicare cuts result from the OBBB increasing the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion by 2034, as the 2010 Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) Act requires that legislation that increases the deficit must be paid for by tax increases or spending cuts.

 

How the OBBB Impacts Nutrition: SNAP

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) is the countrys largest nutrition assistance program, supporting more than 42 million people with low incomes to afford food. The OBBB will result in an estimated 22 million families losing some or all of their SNAP benefits.

Limiting Benefits

The new law limits future increases to the Thrifty Food Plan, which is used to determine SNAP benefit levels, only allowing adjustments for inflation. This will likely mean that peoples SNAP benefits wont keep up with the rising cost of food.

Expanding Work Requirements

The law also expands existing SNAP work requirementsIt changes requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents by raising the age of exemption from 55 to 65. This requires caregivers to work if their children are at least 14, and veterans and unhoused people to work. It removes the grace period for individuals who were in the foster care system (who previously did not have to work until age 24) and restricts statesability to waive work requirements in areas with unemployment above 10% or limited job opportunities.

 

An Error Rate Penalty

SNAP is federally funded, but the new law requires that states with at least a 6% payment error rate pay 5-15% of SNAP costs. Fear of losing federal funding due to payment errors could result in states denying eligible people's coverage.

How the OBBB Impacts Reproductive Health Care: Planned Parenthood and Maine Family Planning

The OBBB defunds Planned Parenthood and Maine Family Planning by banning people from using Medicaid at health care nonprofits that:

  • Provide abortions outside of cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant persons life is in danger; and
  • Received more than $800,000 in Medicaid funding in FY23, for the following year.

 

Federal funding, including Medicaid, is already prohibited from covering abortion services except in case of rape, incest, or life endangerment of the pregnant person.

The
new law threatens to close nearly 200 Planned Parenthood health centers,
60% of which are in medically underserved areas, primary care health professional shortage areas, or rural areas. More than 1.1 million people could lose access to affordable health care, including contraception, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatments.

Further, as more than 90% of the centers at risk of closure are in states where abortion is legal, the closures could eliminate one in four abortion providers nationwide.

Both Planned Parenthood and Maine Family Planning have filed lawsuits challenging the law.

 

How the OBBB Impacts Immigration and Border Enforcement

The OBBB further limits which categories of lawfully present immigrants can receive Medicaid, Medicare, and SNAP. It removes refugees, asylees, and more who have already paid into the programs.

The OBBB also provides more than $170 billion for immigration and border enforcement activities to the Department of Homeland Security including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection and to the Department of Defense. This includes $45 billion to build new detention centers more than four times ICE's annual detention budget nearly $47 billion for border wall construction, nearly $30 billion for ICE enforcement and deportation, $13.5 billion to reimburse state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, and $1 billion for the military to support immigration enforcement.

The law also rolls back asylum and child welfare protections, including undermining due process and allowing the indefinite detention of children and families.It also imposes new and increased application fees.

 

How the OBBB Impacts Education

The OBBB also makes many changes to education. Notably, the law allows states to opt into a federal school voucher program. The program incentivizes people to donate money to nonprofits that offer educational scholarships by offering a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for how much a taxpayer donates up to $1,700. Then, these scholarship-granting organizations distribute money for certain educational expenses, including tuition at private or religious schools.

As school voucher programs effectively redirect public funds for private school tuition, they divert resources from the public education system.

How the OBBB Impacts Tax Cuts

The OBBB law expands and makes permanent the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, whose tax cuts disproportionately benefit wealthy Americans.

 

According to analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the highest-earning 5% will receive more than 45% of the cuts, the highest-earning 20% of Americans will receive more than 70% of the cuts, and the lowest-earning 20% will receive less than 1% of the cuts.

How Did Congress Pass This Law?

The OBBB passed through budget reconciliation, a special legislative process that allows Congress to quickly pass laws that change federal mandatory spending (like Medicaid, Medicare, and SNAP), revenues (taxes), and/or the debt limit. This legislation can move quickly because it faces a special procedure in the Senate; it can only include budget-related items and requires 51 votes instead of the usual 60 to start debate.


On July 1, the Senate passed the bill with a vote of 51 to 50
: three Republican Senators Susan Collins (ME), Rand Paul (KY), and Thom Tillis (NC) joined Democrats in opposing the legislation, forcing the Vice President to cast the tie-breaking vote to move the bill forward.

 

On July 3, the House passed the bill with a vote of 218 to 214. Two Republican members of the House Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-1) and Thomas Massie (KY-4) joined all Democrats in opposing the legislation. On July 4, the President signed the bill into law.

 

 



Return to Table of Contents


Thank You, Voter Services: Voter Information & Outreach All Summer Long

LWVSKC


It's been a busy summer tabling at numerous events and more will soon be happening; if you see us, come say hello and let us know how we're doing! The below events are just a snapshot of what we've been up to: 

  • The Othello Festival
  • WELD Seattle
  • Phone banked in support of the Seattle Prop 1 Democracy Voucher Renewal
  • Participated in Good Trouble Lives On events throughout King County
  • Offered voter registration services at naturalization ceremonies
  • Participated in No Kings Day throughout King County
  • Participated in Shoreline College's annual Civics Fair
  • Represented LWVSKC at the Seattle Peace Chorus
Behind the scenes, we've also been working on numerous candidate forums for the fall. From Auburn and Burien to Mercer Island and Lake Forest Park, you'll have opportunities to see, meet, and ask questions of the candidates for our local offices.

The first one is September 30 for the Highline School District and will be held at 6 p.m. at the Burien King County Library. The candidates for positions 2, 3 and 4 are participating.

Be sure to keep an eye out for all the upcoming events on our calendar! 



Return to Table of Contents


Redistricting Is at a Crossroads: How Voters Can Achieve Fair Representation

LWVUS

 

Since the first decennial census in 1790, the United States has redrawn political districts every 10 years based on population counts. This rhythm has been a cornerstone of representative government, offering stability, predictability, trust, and a measure of fairness. 

Let’s be honest: We’re only talking about mid-cycle redistricting now because politicians fear losing power. And they’re willing to rewrite the rules to keep it. 

 

It began in Texas, where unusual pressure from the president spurred Republican legislators to push a redistricting plan five years before the next census. The stated rationale isn’t population change or fairness, but pure political calculus. Using a special session, Texas lawmakers want to rush through maps that entrench power and limit voter choice. Instead of earning votes through policies that help Americans, they’re manipulating the maps to tilt elections before voters even get to the ballot box.

 

While it began in Texas and spread to other Republican-led states, several Democratic governors are now preparing to counter by drawing new maps of their own. This dangerous tit-for-tat turns redistricting into a partisan arms race. The losers are the voters, regardless of party.

 

Reports indicate the White House and Justice Department are also urging state officials, applying political pressure to shape district boundaries. In a healthy democracy, map-drawing is guided by transparency, fairness, and the will of the people — not by the heavy hand of those in power. 

This is no minor skirmish. The House of Representatives controls investigations into election security, government accountability, and policies that affect millions — from access to health care to immigration enforcement. And this is not business as usual. Mid-cycle map manipulation is a high-stakes strategy to lock in control and shield those in power from voter accountability.  

If the political class can silence one community today, they can silence yours tomorrow.

 

On the final day of its term, the US Supreme Court threw a curveball in Louisiana v. Callais, a case concerning whether to create a second majority-Black congressional district under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). After hearing arguments in March, the Court declined to rule, instead calling for new briefs on whether such a district violates the Constitution. This reframing places the constitutionality of Section 2 of the VRA — one of the last federal protections against racially discriminatory voting laws —  squarely before the court.

That’s not judicial review. It’s an open door for racial discrimination in redistricting.


History tells us
what’s at stake. As Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote
“Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests.” In Baker v. Carr (1962), the Court made redistricting reviewable by the judiciary.

In Reynolds v. Sims (1964), it established “one person, one vote,” requiring districts to have roughly equal populations so every vote carries equal weight. Those rulings embedded fairness into the redistricting process and made clear that political power cannot be based on outdated data or partisan manipulation. 

Scrapping that rhythm invites chaos.

 

And we know who will lose most: communities of color, young people, and new citizens whose voting power is already under strain. 

Fair maps must be drawn with integrity, public participation, and strong legal safeguards. If states redraw maps to silence voters, the League of Women Voters will litigate to empower voters. We will also work alongside any pro-democracy leaders — regardless of party — who believe redistricting should empower the people. 

But we cannot do it alone. Protecting fair representation will require sustained action from voters, advocates, and community leaders. Voters must stay vigilant and engaged at every stage of the redistricting process. First, attend public hearings in your state to make your voice heard. Next, submit written comments that call for maps to reflect the needs of your community. Finally, connect with neighbors, faith groups, civic organizations, and trusted local leaders to organize an observer corps that can respond quickly when proposed maps threaten fairness.  

 

Equally important is supporting state and local efforts to pass strong redistricting reforms that mandate transparency, accountability, and public input. This includes advocating for and protecting independent commissions, having clear criteria that prohibits partisan gerrymandering, and ensuring the public has open access to all map-drawing data. Journalists and civic leaders can help by explaining what’s at stake in clear, relatable terms, sharing how district lines affect so much of our daily lives — like which schools get funded, which roads get repaired, and how health care gets delivered. By connecting redistricting to everyday issues and the balance of power in government, the media can empower people about why fair maps matter and why participation is essential. 

Protecting fair representation is not a spectator sport. It is a collective responsibility that demands persistence, courage, and collaboration. When voters stand together, push for smart reforms, and refuse to be sidelined, we can secure maps that honor every voice and safeguard the foundations of our democracy.  

America, it’s time to stay alert, organize, speak up, and defend democracy. It's time to rise.

 




Return to Table of Contents


Why Local Elections are Critical to Democracy

LWVUS


Every year is an election year. Even if they are not on the daily news, in the local paper, or on your Instagram feed, local elections happen annually in the United States. The officials elected and the decisions they make affect your daily life as much, if not more, than those in the federal government. From road repairs, schools, and urban planning to immigration and policing, local government is a constant presence in every part of American life.  

 

Yet many local races are decided with extremely low turnout and little competition. In New York City's 2023 city council elections, turnout was a miniscule 7.2% in the primary election and 12.8% in the general election, and 87.5% of races were decided in the first round. These elections were to elect local lawmakers for a city of almost 8.5 million people and a police force of 36,000 officers and 19,000 civilian employees.

To make matters worse, many local elections go completely uncontested. In 2024, out of 76,902 elections in 50 states, the District of Columbia, and five territories covered by Ballotpedia, 53,485 (almost 70%) were uncontested.

Many states also do not have fair redistricting requirements for district-based local governments, or elect officials via at-large elections, which often prevent full representation of people of color in communities by diluting their voting power.

Voters must participate in local races and fight for new laws protecting fair local government elections.

Local Government Affects Every Part of Life

For this article, local government means city councils, school boards, county commissions, local judges, and similar governing bodies and positions elected by district or all voters. Depending on the state and local jurisdiction, various elected offices are available for citizens wishing to run for public office.

 

Some states, like Colorado, elect county coroners, who oversee investigations into deaths and autopsies. Voters in other states elect officials who oversee water infrastructure, soil conservation, public utilities, and other vital services. For example, voters in Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida elect officials who oversee soil and water conservation districts. Collectively, these bodies contain an immense level of responsibility. Some form of local government decides whether your city can build more housing, books stay on school shelves, or if local governments assist ICE.

Given the scope of these powers, one of the great deficiencies in American democracy is the lack of protection of free and fair local government elections in many states. Local governments in states from California to Texas have suffered from illegal gerrymandering, which robs voters of their right to fair representation and honest government, along with other forms of voter suppression.

How Voters Can Fight Back

Fortunately, voters have begun to fight back with state voting rights acts. Designed to parallel the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, these new laws create essential protections to ensure fair representation for voters of color, prevent gerrymandering, and ensure people can have free and fair elections in local government. Just recently, New York, Connecticut, Colorado, Washington, and Minnesota have all enacted state voting rights acts. Other state voting rights acts are pending, like in Marylandor came close to passage, as in Michigan, California, and Colorado have also passed legislation to require fair redistricting in local governments.

 

Several of these new laws have already had a clear effect on local governments and their structures. For example, Nassau County, NY, settled a lawsuit brought under the New York State Voting Rights Act, redrawing the districts to allow voters of color to elect candidates of their choice in six of the 19 county council districts instead of the previous four.

 

The League of Women Voters has long supported fair elections in local government, both in legislatures and in the courtroom. Leagues have brought cases in places like San Luis Obispo, California; Weld County, Coloradoand Cobb County, Georgia to ensure voters were fairly represented in their local governments. Theyve also advocated in legislatures nationwide to pass new laws protecting fair local elections.

But on top of all election protections, our democracy relies on voters casting their ballots. Those who sit in the halls of local government control or affect every facet of daily life. Unresponsive local government, barricaded by gerrymandering or vote dilution, is a government that eventually fails to fulfill its duty to the people. Voting in local elections and passing state voting rights acts and other legislation to protect local government is vital to ensure Americans have a representative local government that responds to their needs.

 


  

Return to Table of Contents



John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

LWVUS

What is the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (JLVRAA)?
The JLVRAA ensures that every voter—regardless of where they live, what they look like, or what language they speak—has equal access to the ballot box and is protected from unfair laws and practices that make it harder for people to vote.

The JLVRAA establishes a targeted process for reviewing voting changes based on measures that have historically been used to discriminate against voters. The process for reviewing changes in voting is limited to a certain set of circumstances, such as establishing photo ID laws or reducing multilingual voting materials, which have been shown to have a discriminatory impact.

Why Do We Need It?
The JLVRAA restores and modernizes the original protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) to combat many of the new and recent discriminatory voting requirements that states have enacted that disproportionately prevent people of color, women, the elderly, and youth from voting.

The JLVRAA allows federal courts to immediately halt questionable voting practices until a final ruling is made. This is crucial because when voting rights are at stake, prohibiting a discriminatory practice after the election has concluded is too late to truly protect voters' rights.

Issues like healthcare, education, and transportation are all affected by the politicians we elect. The JLVRAA restores the protections of the original VRA to make sure people are able to equally and accessibly exercise their right to vote and choose their elected representatives.

Politicians can’t have unchecked powerOur democracy is meant to be a system of checks and balances and the JLVRAA is a mechanism for the courts to serve as a check on legislative power.

Why Does It Need to be Restored?
Shelby County v. Holder invalidated the section of the Voting Rights Act that required certain states and local governments to obtain federal approval before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices if the states had a history of voting discrimination against racial, ethnic, and language minorities. It also invalidated the formula that determined which jurisdictions fall under federal oversight.

In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court asked Congress to come up with a modern-day formula that protects voting rights. The Voting Rights Advancement Act accomplishes this by enacting voter protections for states with a record of suppressive voting practices in the last 25 years.

Since Shelby County v. Holderthere has been a steady increase in the number of restrictive voting laws that disproportionately suppress turnout among minorities, young adults, and the elderly. The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act provides the necessary tools to address these discriminatory voting practices and protects all Americans’ access to the ballot box.

LWV Support of the JLVRAA
LWVUS believes that voting is a fundamental citizen right that must be guaranteed; all eligible voters, particularly those from traditionally underrepresented or underserved communities, including first-time voters, non-college youth, new citizens, minorities, and low-income Americans, must have the opportunity and the information they need to exercise their right to vote.

LWVUS believes in ensuring a free, fair, and accessible electoral system for all eligible voters.

LWVUS actively opposes voter photo ID laws, advocates against barriers to the voter registration process, works to prevent last-minute Election Day barriers, and helps millions of voters get the information and required documentation they need to vote.

Why Do We Connect the JLVRAA to Redistricting?
The VRA ensured that jurisdictions with a history of racial gerrymandering and vote dilution had to clear their maps in the courts to ensure they were fairly drawn. Without the continued provisions in the JLVRAA, our maps are in exceptional danger of vote dilution and gerrymandering for the coming decade.

Voters should choose their elected representatives; representatives should not choose their voters. We can’t let elected officials pass discriminatory voting measures to keep themselves in power and draw themselves into power with safe district maps. We must pass the JLVRAA to protect our right to vote and hold our elected officials accountable.

Communities should be kept together. The needs of your community can’t be met if your voices are split between districts or some members are unable to vote. The JLVRAA protects voters against restrictive voting laws and provides an oversight process so district maps are drawn fairly, prioritizing communities.

What can you do to support passage of the VRAA?
People can support the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act by contacting their members of Congress and asking them to support this legislation.

Statistics and Examples of Recent Voter Suppression
The fight for voting rights is as urgent today as it was decades ago. In 2016, in our first presidential election without the protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, we saw the targeted attempts at voter suppression: some areas cut polling places, states racially gerrymandered and 36 states now have voter ID laws. We need the JLVRAA to protect our voting rights.

It is an unfortunate fact that discrimination in voting against voters of racial, ethnic, and language minorities continues in America.

In the past decade, states have imposed new restrictions on early voting despite the fact that nearly a third of 2024 voters (32%) cast their ballot in person prior to Election Day, up from 27% in 2020. (Pew Research Center

In 2019, Tennessee imposed new hurdles for third-party voter registration drives in response to efforts to register black voters by the Tennessee Black Voter Project ahead of the 2018 election.

Between 2012 and 2016, jurisdictions no longer subject to federal pre-clearance had purge rates significantly higher than jurisdictions that were never under pre-clearance. (Source: Brennan Center for Justice)

Since 2013, Florida, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia have conducted illegal purges. Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, and Maine have written policies that violate the National Voter Registration Act and provide for illegal purges.



  

Return to Table of Contents



Empowering Voters on National Voter Registration Day!

LWVSKC


Founded in 2012, National Voter Registration Day (NVRD) is a nationwide civic holiday dedicated to celebrating democracy by registering voters. The League are proud celebrants of this holiday, and in past years, we reached an estimated 100,000 voters on NVRD.


National Voter Registration Day is one of the four civic holidays that the League of Women Voters of Seattle King County (LWVSKC) celebrates each year:

  • September 16: National Voter Registration Day
  • October 6 - 10: National Voter Education Week
  • October 28: Vote Early Day
  • November 3: Election Hero Day


LWVSKC will be registering voters as we do every year on and around this day - but you too can enable others to register to vote! Engage this September 16 - do you have a niece or nephew that has not registered yet? Or a grandchild who is 16?  Young adults can pre-register to vote at age 16 in Washington State; they can even register online. Sit down with your relative or friend, visit VoteWA.gov, and register to vote or update your registration if need be. And remember to sign up for ballot alerts so you can receive text messages or emails detailing each stage of your ballot's journey through the election process.


Let's all be civically engaged this September 16 and encourage others to register to vote!




Return to Table of Contents


King County Primary Elections Observations

LWVSKC


Several LWVSKC members shared their observations of various aspects of the King County primary elections — from training of employees through to a review meeting post election day. Here are some of their observations.

Carrie Bagatell - Signature verification training July 17, 2025
Training is for all temporary staff working the upcoming election, returning employees as well as new ones. All present on July 17 were returning employees. Employees must sit through training for each election or primary because state rules can change between elections. Everyone seemed to be paying attention, despite having heard the information multiple times before.

Guidelines for conduct were reviewed. Staff must always work in pairs and should never leave ballots unattended. The public can view many aspects of the vote counting process, and staff need to be careful how they behave. One of the supervisors recounted a story about how a viewer called the elections bureau to report that one of the staff members was using their cellphone on the floor; having cellphones and other personal items on the secure floor is strictly prohibited.

The trainer reviewed guidelines for signature verification. The signature on the ballot envelope is assumed to be that of the voter unless there is good evidence to the contrary. The trainer reviewed attributes of a signature that help staff determine whether the signature on the ballot adequately matches the signature on the voter registration form. She then reviewed some standard analysis methods used by forensic signature experts, and we even played a little game to practice signature analysis (I did somewhat less well than the experienced staff).

If there are multiple discrepancies between the signature on the ballot envelope and the signature on file, the voter needs to be contacted and is asked to provide a valid signature. Voters can do so electronically or in person. They can also prove their identity by providing the last 4 of their SSN, their full driver’s license number, a copy of a current utility bill, or by providing other authorized documents.

All in all, the process for verifying signatures is well standardized, and the voters are always given the benefit of the doubt. The supervisors worked hard to make the training interesting enough to keep employees’ attention, and despite technical glitches, they seem to have succeeded.

Lynne Langseth - July 24, 2025
I observed on July 24 and planned on watching the ballot reviews; that team was in training so instead I observed four functions - ballot intake in the warehouse (ballot-collection drivers have to lock up  their cell phones as soon as they enter the building), ballot sorting, ballot scanning, and ballot opening. 

Ballot intake was interesting in that the collection drivers brought in five seemingly unopened and undelivered ballots that had been found on a sidewalk and turned into the Federal Way Police Department.  The address side of the ballot was photocopied by a manager for record-keeping purposes and mailing of replacement ballots. The unopened and undelivered ballots were then labeled and placed inside the locked cage by the same manager.  I additionally found out that ballot-collection drivers are sent to the homes of individuals who find unopened ballots and report them to the Elections Office.   

Janet Sisson - August 4, 2025
I observed this morning while getting my steps in, and learned from Lynda, Joe, and Josh, all King County Elections workers. King County Elections makes sure every vote is counted no matter how messed up a ballot may be. I have an admission to make; I had my phone in my pocket, pulled it out to turn off the volume and was scolded. With only 31% expected to vote, I realized I could be more active in my community.
Cindy and Mark Piennett -August 4, 2025

We observed the Vote Center in Federal Way, which was held in the upstairs lobby and conference room at City Hall. There was a very helpful supervisor and four other staff on hand, who could assist voters to register to vote, get a replacement ballot, etc. There were voting stations and tables where the voter could fill out their ballot on site, immediately after their voter registration had been processed, and then drop in a smaller drop box at the Vote Center. There were voter guide pamphlets on site in many languages, plus a selection of “I Voted” stickers. There was a security guard at the Vote Center, as well. One person came in while we were there, but only to drop off his ballot and get a sticker. The Vote Center had been open on Saturday, Monday, and Tuesday for the hours that city hall is open, including until 8:00pm on Election Day. But there had not been a lot of activity, less than 10 people per day, that needed assistance.

 

Jennifer Horner - August 7, 2025
I observed at the King County elections office in Renton from 9-10:30am and found it very interesting. I first observed a "batch audit" of the count for KC Exec. There were three teams of two people, each with a box of 250 votes that had been scanned/counted, and their job was to manually perform a recount to confirm that the scanning machine counted correctly. This took about 30 minutes (each team counted two boxes, so a total of 1,500 votes were audited) and was overseen by a couple of supervisors. There were no issues, all votes were counted correctly.

Next, I observed teams performing "ballot review," in which multiple teams of two were at computers viewing write-in votes, no votes, and under/over votes. They looked at scanned images of ballots, specifically the ovals that were marked/mismarked/unmarked, that had been flagged by the scanning machine as being outliers. As a two-person team, they determined (per rules established by the Canvassing Board) the intention of the voter and updated the ballot online. This was super interesting to watch.

After that, I observed in the "ballot opening" area, where several people sat (individually) with a bin of 250 unopened envelopes, and they first removed the security envelope from the outside envelope, counted the outside envelopes, and zip-tied them. Then they removed the ballot from the security envelope, counted the security envelopes, and zip-tied them. Lastly, they unfolded the ballots and laid them flat, then counted them. They had to number and initial their counts on a cardboard box, which then got placed a rolling shelf mark "ready for scanner."

To finish, I walked through the "signature review" and "envelope review" area and spoke with a supervisor. Interesting to realize (maybe obvious but I didn't think about it) that 100% of envelopes are reviewed by a human pair of eyes to verify that the signature is accurate/matches what is on file with voter registration. This group of 8-10 people look at all scanned envelopes, four at a time, to determine whether they can pass through to "ballot opening" or get rerouted to "envelope review." If the latter, they are further reviewed by another group of eight people who look at the scanned envelope individually and compare it in more detail to voter registration records and past signatures from previous election envelopes.

There are efforts made to get a voter to "cure" or correct their unsigned envelope. Ultimately, unsigned envelopes are still opened and counted, but the vote is not tabulated. King County Elections reaches out to the voter to let them know that their ballot was received and counted but is not part of the official record because of the missing signature.  

I'm so glad I had the chance to observe (despite the awful morning traffic due to I-5 construction). The staff/supervisors were helpful, friendly, and seemed pleased to have observers there.  I'll definitely do it again.

Cindy and Mark Piennett - August 14, 2025

Today my husband and I observed the First/Final Post-Election Canvassing Board meeting for the August 5 primary election. It was a fascinating 45 minutes held in person at the KC elections office, where the Canvassing Board reviewed all the ballots that had issues and required the Canvassing Board to decide how to count them.

 

The Canvassing Board has three members: Julie Wise, Auditor/Director of Elections; Kimberly Frederick, Prosecuting Attorney’s Office; and our own former LWVSKC President Stephanie Cirkovich, King County Council Representative. Unfortunately, Stephanie was not at the meeting, so I did not get to say hello, but the other two made a quorum and the meeting carried on.

 

Of the roughly 485,000 ballots that were processed, only 49 had issues that needed to be resolved at the meeting. Most of these had a common issue of the voter drawing a line through all the ovals next to the candidate names on the ballot for a certain race, but not all competitions on that ballot.  For those ballots, the Canvassing Board ruled that those races with the line through the ovals were an “undercount”.  Meaning that no candidate was selected and the vote for that race would not be counted. There were a few ballots where two ovals had been filled in for the same race, and those were ruled “overcount”, so they would not be counted either. A few had enough information that the Canvassing Board could rule that the voter had intended a specific candidate. After the decisions were made on the 49 ballots, a motion was voted to instruct the staff going forward to call the issue when a line is drawn through the ovals to be an undercount.

 

Mark and I found it to be very straightforward and agreed with their decisions. It was reassuring to see the professionalism and true desire from all involved to have an accurate count. It was recorded and will be available on their YouTube channel. The Certification meeting will be virtual and held on August 19 at 3pm.

 

We also went upstairs to observe what was happening on the processing floor. We saw a group of six people reviewing issues with signatures and only one staff member in the area reviewing ballot issues. Both supervisors were very helpful and explained what remaining work that was being done.

 

A very positive experience and we look forward to observing in the future.




Return to Table of Contents


Save the Date: LWVSKC Education Committee

LWVSKC


LWVSKC Education Committee is hosting a conversation with Christian Sinderman and Hyeok Kim, who are leading the campaign for Seattle's Education and Early Learning Levy Renewal on October 4 at 4:00 PM via Zoom (link will be available soon on our calendar). We have asked them to share both the successes of the current levy and the key improvements and changes in the upcoming measure. Everyone is encouraged to attend and learn about the levy, the needs of the community, and ask questions.

 

Return to Table of Contents


Unite and Rise 8.5: What's Happening Locally

Sarah Beth Miller


Have you read or heard about the LWV-US Unite and Rise 8.5 project in the our Tuesday newsletters or in messages from the national LWV?

 

This spring, a group of your LWVSKC colleagues began to meet and brainstorm about launching a local Unite and Rise effortBuilding on the information from the LWVUS, we developed our own letter* for Unite and Rise 8.5. We intend to send this letter to friends, family, and more, whether they live locally or elsewhere in the country.

 

Our letter asks people to commit to taking actions to defend democracy, and it provides ideas and links to get started. The letter is for everyone; no one is being asked to join the LWV or make any donations. We also promise not to send a flood of emails; we will send updates every 90 days with actions that folks can do.

 

Generating more ways to get the Unite and Rise 8.5 message out to the public is high on our list of prioritiesWe are exploring local athletic events, cultural events, and other venues; we also hope to reach out to local newspapers and publications.

 

One of our main priorities is to expand our message into smaller, more rural communities in King County by reaching out to our members in those areas for local events, markets, and festivals.

 

We are very excited about these ideas, and hope that you are, too; but we need more ideas and we need plenty of volunteers to execute themWe welcome your ideas and participation as we continue to expand our efforts.

 

Our Unite and Rise 8.5 Committee has been meeting twice a month. Our next meeting will be on Thursday, September 4 from 6-7:30 pm. Please contact Sarah Beth Miller at unitliaison@lwvskc.org for more information.



____________________________________________________________________

*Letter is below 

 

Dear ______,

 

Concerned about the dramatic changes happening in our country? Looking for actions you can take? I am writing to you as a member of the League of Women Voters (LWV), which is a political grassroots network that believes that the freedom to vote is a nonpartisan issue. For more than a century, weve worked to empower voters and defend democracy. I am asking you to join with us to help with this defense.

 

League of Women Voters has launched a powerful new initiative, Unite and Rise 8.5; through this committee, we will engage and mobilize 8.5 million voters to protect and preserve our democracy.

 

Looking at hundreds of campaigns over the last century, Erica Chenoweth, political scientist at Harvard and author of Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict, found that nonviolent campaigns are twice as likely to achieve their goals as violent campaigns. And although the exact dynamics will depend on many factors, she has shown it takes around 3.5% of the population actively participating in the protests to ensure serious political change.

The number 8.5 million is the estimated number of voters in the United States that it would take to reach 3.5% and to increase the likelihood of bringing about change through nonviolent protest.

 

I am asking you to join in this effort and sign the attached Commitment to Defend Democracy.

 

We ask you to stand with us - you do not have to be a member, and you will not be asked to join. You will not receive donation requests or be inundated with more emails. You will receive a communication every 90 days with new suggestions for actions you can take.




Return to Table of Contents


We’d Like to Hear from You!


Not sure who to reach? You can always find us at info@lwvskc.org or 206-329-4848 or check our events calendar for more information.

Want to stop by our office? Our hours are irregular this month so please call ahead to plan a visit.  We moved in December, but just within the same building. We’re located at: 


Melbourne Tower

1511 3rd Avenue, Suite 801

Seattle, WA 98101


Executive Committee of the Board of LWVSKC

President

Barbara Tengtio

president@lwvskc.org

Vice-President

Janet Lenart

vp@lwvskc.org

Secretary

Laura Rudert

secretary@lwvskc.org

Co-Treasurer

Carol Levin

treasurer@lwvskc.org

Co-Treasurer

Akilah Stewart

treasurer@lwvskc.org


Directors of the Board of LWVSKC
 

Co-Unit Liaison

Sarah Beth Miller

unitliaison@lwvskc.org

Co-Unit Liaison

Keela Williams

unitliaison@lwvskc.org

Voter Services Co-Chair

Julie Sarkissian

voterservices@lwvskc.org
Voter Services Co-Chair Dianne Benigno voterservices@lwvskc.org

Program Co-Chair

Cindy Krebs

program@lwvskc.org
Program Co-Chair Evelyn Strawn program@lwvskc.org
Development Chair Phillippa Kassover  development@lwvskc.org
Membership Chair Marie Cooley membership@lwvskc.org


Committee Chairs for LWVSKC

Economics and Taxation

Marilee Fuller

marileefuller@yahoo.com

Education

Joanna Cullen

jfoxcullen@gmail.com

Investment

Cindy Piennett

cindypiennett@gmail.com

Finance Kim Albert kim.a@lwvskc.org
Youth Civic Engagement Sarah Beth Miller
Barb Tengtio
sarahbethmiller410@gmail.com
president@lwvskc.org
Unite and Rise Action Keela Williams keela.w@lwvskc.org


Nominating Committee for LWVSKC

Chair

Chelsea Jordan

nominate@lwvskc.org


And if you’re looking for the editor of The Voter, reach out to votereditor@lwvskc.org!


Find us on the web at lwvskc.org!


Return to Table of Contents

Quick link for this page is: https://www.lwvskc.org/thevoter